Rabbit
(Weather Master)
Fri May 18 2007 08:26 PM
Re: Who thinks Katrina was a Cat. 5 at landfall.

im going to have to agree with NHC's landfall intensity, and with one addition: New Orleans' structural wind damage was not what you would find in teh western eyewall of a cat v--most of the damage was limited to roof damage, and New Orleans itself only experienced 90-95 mph winds (definately not Cat V eyewall, even if on teh weaker side)

i am willing to agree that Dennis may have been 155 at landfall in Cuba though, as NHC's only stated reason for not classifying it so was the pressure of 937 mb (even though Charley was classified in 2004 at 150 mph with 941 mb pressure), and both had very small eyes and tight circulations



Note: This is NOT an official page. It is run by weather hobbyists and should not be used as a replacement for official sources. 
CFHC's main servers are currently located at Hostdime.com in Orlando, FL.
Image Server Network thanks to Mike Potts and Amazon Web Services. If you have static file hosting space that allows dns aliasing contact us to help out! Some Maps Provided by:
Great thanks to all who donated and everyone who uses the site as well. Site designed for 800x600+ resolution
When in doubt, take the word of the National Hurricane Center