F
Current Radar or Satellite Image

Flhurricane.com - Central Florida Hurricane Center - Tracking Storms since 1995Hurricanes Without the Hype! Since 1995


Chill falls over the Atlantic as the official season heads towards close
Days since last H. Landfall - US: Any 211 (Idalia) , Major: 211 (Idalia) Florida - Any: 211 (Idalia) Major: 211 (Idalia)
None
COMMUNICATION
STORM DATA
CONTENT
FOLLOW US
ADS
Login to remove ads

 


General Discussion >> Hurricane Ask/Tell

Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1
ClarkModerator
Meteorologist


Reged: Wed
Posts: 1710
Loc:
Dvorak technique estimates
      #48082 - Tue Aug 16 2005 10:21 PM

Came across a paper from 2004 by Jim Kossin and Chris Velden at the Univ. of Wisconsin, available at http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/~kossin/articles/kossin_velden_MWR.pdf, detailing errors in the Dvorak technique. Without having to read the article, here's the quick summary...

* There is a prononunced latitude-dependent bias in sea-level pressure estimates using the Dvorak technique, with MSLP values generally being too high (lowering intensity estimates) at higher latitudes. The bias percentage is roughly 10% at higher latitudes (before extratropical transition) and is near-zero around 23N/Tropic of Cancer.
* However, a paper by Chris Landsea (and others) in 2003 suggested that for a given pressure obtained via the Dvorak technique, the wind estimate is generally too strong, a feature that grows worse with increasing latitude.
* These two "biases" contrast and, as Kossin & Velden discovered, nearly cancel each other (all but about 2% of the variance), which makes sense. Lower pressures correspond to higher wind speeds, all other factors being equal, so a bias towards higher pressures that is corrected is going to tend to lead to higher wind speeds...a factor already (mistakenly) accounted for by the Dvorak estimate of wind speed.

What does it all mean? Given that there has yet to be an update of the Dvorak technique with these two studies in mind to account for the latitude bias, it means that our pressure estimates for storms at high latitudes like Irene are generally too high. For instance, the objective Dvorak pressure estimate from the UWisconsin website (http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/tropic.html) for Irene corresponds to a pressure of 964mb -- or 11mb lower than the 5p NHC estimate. This meshes well with the ~10% bias discovered in the paper. Their wind speed estimate of 82kt matches well with their Dvorak estimate of T4.7 and is just below that expected for a T-number of 5.0 (as given by SSD and used in the initial intensity estimate for Irene by the NHC at 5p), suggesting little modification needed (or made) to the wind speed estimate.

--------------------
Current Tropical Model Output Plots
(or view them on the main page for any active Atlantic storms!)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1



Extra information
0 registered and 50 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  CFHC, Ed Dunham, Colleen A., danielw, Clark, RedingtonBeachGuy, Bloodstar, tpratch, typhoon_tip, cieldumort 

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 2914

Rate this topic

Jump to

Note: This is NOT an official page. It is run by weather hobbyists and should not be used as a replacement for official sources. 
CFHC's main servers are currently located at
Hostdime.com in Orlando, FL.
Image Server Network thanks to Mike Potts and Amazon Web Services. If you have static file hosting space that allows dns aliasing contact us to help out! Some Maps Provided by:
Great thanks to all who donated and everyone who uses the site as well. Site designed for 800x600+ resolution
When in doubt, take the word of the National Hurricane Center