Passive Aggressive.

That's a pretty shallow and short sighted view. Patiently waiting to be attacked and then becoming aggressive and fighting back is exactly what cost over 3,000 Americans their lives on September 11, 2001.

In todays world, pre-emptive strikes allow the Commander in Chief to take the battle to the enemy rather than fight them on our own shores. President Bush made an interesting comment about a "gathering threat". A gathering threat is when you are off in the distance watching your enemy train day and night, preparing to do harm to your people.

The question is a simple one. Do you want to fight the enemy over there, or do you want to fight them here, in your schools, downtown parks and plazas and small coffee shops like they do in Isreal. Do you want terrorists to gain a foothold that allows them to take over a school like in Russia? No, I say the best thing to do is to take the fight to them on their own soil (or someone elses), hunt everyone of them down and kill them unmercifully (no bonus points for style).

The fact that so many terrorists are going into Iraq to fight the U.S. military is a good one. Kerry and his liberal morons claim that we are now less safe because of the terrorists entering Iraq. This is complete and utter crap. The U.S. has defined the battle field and has drawn these people out to fight on foreign soil rather than fight them here. Any conclusion to the contrary is wrong headed and foolish.

So... you can take your ignorance to the next level by disagreeing with simple truth or take the straight path to common sense.