Lysis
(User)
Sat Jan 22 2005 01:13 PM
Attachment
Re: Initial Outlook for 2005

Dr. Grays numbers seem to be the lowest. While I personally will not even hope to make a prediction for fear of bieng wrong, I thought that the NHC diddnt forcast intensity, --only location. At any rate, these varying forcast differ greatly --and this isn't the NHC. Now, I know that it is still early in the game, but could we have some reasoning with each respected forcast? Or is that not the purpose of this game? I use the term 'game' loosly, and I am in no way implying that hurricanes are a game. However, I feel that this forcasting competition has become one. To add a bit of a scientific flair to all this, I believe that anyone who dares to bet on the numbers, should include at least a little reasoning. Sorry --just had to say it.

EDIT: for example, like Clark



Note: This is NOT an official page. It is run by weather hobbyists and should not be used as a replacement for official sources. 
CFHC's main servers are currently located at Hostdime.com in Orlando, FL.
Image Server Network thanks to Mike Potts and Amazon Web Services. If you have static file hosting space that allows dns aliasing contact us to help out! Some Maps Provided by:
Great thanks to all who donated and everyone who uses the site as well. Site designed for 800x600+ resolution
When in doubt, take the word of the National Hurricane Center