HanKFranK
(User)
Fri Jul 02 2004 01:01 AM
Re: Accuwx Landfall Predictions

they're calling for a landmark year. if we don't get one, they blew it.. simple as that. personally gotta go with the conservative side here.. don't see that many landfalls this year (though i do expect a couple to be noteworthy, and perhaps a couple just humdum). a real coup for accuwx if we get walloped a few times, though.
the only really spooky thing is how hard this year is to analog. enso is in limbo, and a lot of the analogs i've seen from various forecast sources don't ring very true (1990 and 2003 are mine, though i can see glaring inconsistencies).
one thing i have a decent mind on.. don't think this year's active spell starts last two weeks of august a la 1998/99. by late this month or early august we should have popped a few off. i'll be really surprised if we get to august without having had a couple.
HF 0101z02july



Note: This is NOT an official page. It is run by weather hobbyists and should not be used as a replacement for official sources. 
CFHC's main servers are currently located at Hostdime.com in Orlando, FL.
Image Server Network thanks to Mike Potts and Amazon Web Services. If you have static file hosting space that allows dns aliasing contact us to help out! Some Maps Provided by:
Great thanks to all who donated and everyone who uses the site as well. Site designed for 800x600+ resolution
When in doubt, take the word of the National Hurricane Center