Unregistered User
(Unregistered)
Fri Jul 23 2004 06:08 PM
Re: "97L"

Phil-

my guess is since 97L totally evaporated, it's be a new imvest #; the invest #s are not like the naming convention, they are 'by event', as i understand it. A system from the same wave, since the old one tanked, would be a new #.

sc