| Unregistered User |
| (Unregistered) |
| Fri Jul 23 2004 10:08 PM |
Re: "97L"
|
Phil-
my guess is since 97L totally evaporated, it's be a new imvest #; the invest #s are not like the naming convention, they are 'by event', as i understand it. A system from the same wave, since the old one tanked, would be a new #.
sc
