CFHC Talkback For News Story #3:
Newest Talkback: 12:25 AM 04-04 EDT

The Next Two Months
04:50 PM EDT - 14 March 2002 | Fifty-six Comments | Read Comments | Last 20 Comments
| Newest: 12:25 AM 04-04 EDT



The next two months at Flhurricane, we'll be slowly moving over to the new 2002 look, which isn't all that different from the current one. We are changing the way talkback will work which will allow us to manage them better, and add a bunch of things for that.

The automated weather bits will change little, but we hope to have everything running by hurricane season.

Right now, we are still using the old system, and feel free to comment.

This season, I think, will be very different from the last few, so we hope to be ready.

Thanks everyone!

- [mac]




Post a comment | Show All Comments | Show Next 14 Comments

Displaying Talkbacks #1 - #14 (of 56 total)

Was Wondering (#1)
Posted by: Amrami Said Mubdullah
Posted On 10:08AM 15-Mar-2002 with id (VSNTYNQVQNRQV*)
I just found your site, and I must say it is quite randy. How come the Natl. Hurricane Center doesn't have any Islamic names for hurricanes?q


Islamic Storm Names (#2)
Posted by: Rich Byett
Posted On 05:57PM 15-Mar-2002 with id (QYTNQQWNQSSNQYV*)
The Natl Hurricane Centre uses names that occur in regions affected by the Hurricanes. As no Islamic countries are affected by Atlantic or Northeastern Pacific Hurricanes, no Islamic names are used.


I REALLY like what you guys are going to do with this website. (#3)
Posted by:
Kevin Location: Orlando, Florida
Posted On 03:57PM 16-Mar-2002 with id (QUXNRURNWRNRPQ*)
I also like the new look on the homepage. I agree with Mike C. when he said that things should be very different in the tropics this year than the last two. We shall see.
Adios,
Kevin


My Two Cents (#4)
Posted by: Vince Vizenzo Location: Palm Beach, Florida
Posted On 08:19AM 17-Mar-2002 with id (VSNUPNWTNSS*)
I disagree. I think you guys are over zealot in your Hurricane predictions. This year will be like the last few. Not much in the Atlantic Region.


Welcome, Vince. Are you new are have you posted before? (#5)
Posted by:
Kevin Location: Orlando, Florida
Posted On 10:05AM 17-Mar-2002 with id (QVXNQYQNYQNQWX*)
Also, what is your reasoning for "not much in the Atlantic Region" this year? Looks active to me. Here's a satellite picture you can use to view to watch the ITCZ:http://www.sat.dundee.ac.uk/pdus/Al/latest.jpg
Look at all of the convection south of 10 north. This is likely because of the high water temperatures of off the COA. Given proper position and strength of Azores High (North w/ pressure of 1010-1015 mbs.) we could see strong hurricanes approach the U.S. this year. Despite a slightly different pattern, this year could be similar to 1996 in its nature. 1996 had a weak to moderate La Nina, but an easterly QBO. This year will be weak El Nino and WESTERLY QBO. Atlantic SLPA's could also be below average this year, thus promoting atmospheric instability. You could be right Vince, but I think it is questionable that the U.S. will go without ANY HURRICANES this year. Last U.S. hurricane making landfall: Hurricane Irene, 15th Oct. 1999. We'll see what this year brings, and I look forward to your posts this year.
Thanks,
Kevin A. Budd
Orlando, Florida


where to put stock (#6)
Posted by: HankFrank Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posted On 06:39PM 17-Mar-2002 with id (QRXNQXVNQRSNQYS*)
for all the off-season climatological talk we've been doing, it still sort of gets me that we could have fourteen named storms and super la nina like in 2000 and only get two weak tropical storms... or six and el nino like in 1992 and get andrew. it really just comes down to what any particular storm does, not how the entire season goes. last year was another year where storms managed to creep out from under ridges and recurve into the atlantic, or steamroll westward through the caribbean and never budge north. all cut from the same mold it seems. now maybe el nino will poke it's opinion back in, break the pattern...
last year we didnt always have the east coast trough, you know. erin was coming along under the ridge, but met with shear, died, and redeveloped further north, out from under the westward drive below the ridge axis. probably saved the southeast from a good wallop in early september. it's the little quirky events that make all the difference, not whether qbo is from the east or the ssts off africa are averaging warm.
but of course i'll follow dr. gray anyway. don't know where they storms will go, but it is nice that he can figure with some accuracy how many we'll need to dodge.


2002 Atlantic hurricane season (#7)
Posted by: John Location: South Florida
Posted On 09:03PM 17-Mar-2002 with id (VTNQRNQPTNQWV*)
12 more hurricanes to go ! I believe!!



There is more red in Atlantic than East Pacific! (#8)
Posted by: John Location: South Florida
Posted On 09:31AM 18-Mar-2002 with id (RPUNQXXNQYWNTQ*)
(Click here)http://www.fnoc.navy.mil/products/OTIS/otis_glbl_sstanomaly.gif


WILD HURRICANES COMING (#9)
Posted by:
LONNY Location: HOLLYWOOD,FL
Posted On 05:01PM 18-Mar-2002 with id (RPUNQXXNQYXNQXQ*)
That is the caption on AOL's Home Page today(3/18/02).When you redirect to that site I think it is just a copy of Bill Grey's Dec. Forcast discussion. Hypen it early I guess...


Response to post #6. (#10)
Posted by:
Kevin Location: Orlando, Florida
Posted On 07:50PM 18-Mar-2002 with id (QVXNQYQNXRNQPR*)
Here's an example of one of last year's storms that nevered touched U.S. soil because of the conditions in the Atlantic. The storm was Erin, as you mentioned. Well, it got sheered out, and perhaps this was because at the time the Azores High was creating too much sheer for Erin to survive. So, it reformed to the north and went fishing because of that. It could have also gotten sheered out the first time around because of the Easterly QBO winds last year. With the Azores High in the proper strength and postion this year (forecasted to be favorable by Gray, but still an unknown effect on 2002 storms as far as I'm concerned), the westerly QBO winds (this will allow the mid-level and low-level circulations to align properly thus decreasing chances of dissipation quite significantly.) Okay, so suppose the 2001 was a year where the Azores High was not causing subsidence and sheer over the Atlantic and it was a westerly QBO year. Well, as you mentioned, Erin wouldn't have dissipated at first and probably would have had a better chance to stay at a low latitude. The U.S. would have probably gotten a good beating had the stuff with Erin not happened. Okay, so the chances of us having more deep tropics storms this year looks pretty good (probably won't be as much of a baroclinic year as last year was), so with the westerly QBO and a possibly more favorable Azores High, what do you think the storms will do this year? Looks like a big East Coast year to me. Once again, the Azores/Bermuda High are the million dollar question this year as far as storm tracks/intensity go.
*Kevin*


Predictions 2002 (#11)
Posted by: Vince Vinzenzo Location: Palm Springs, Florida
Posted On 09:54AM 19-Mar-2002 with id (VSNTYNQVRNRUP*)
Good comments by everyone, indeed. I look foward to debate and discourse throughout the upcoming Hurricane season. I recently retired from the US Navy where I spent 34 years. I'm a retired Vice-Admiral. I spent most of my time in the metorological division of the 6th Fleet. However, I'm still sticking to my guns on this years prediction. I am also starting my own Hurricane Tracking Web site. I just moved here from Rota, Spain. So it may be awhile before it's up and running efficiently.


Welcome Aboard Vince! (#12)
Posted by: Steve H. Location: palm bay, FL
Posted On 12:43PM 19-Mar-2002 with id (QUUNQPTNRSYNQV*)
But can't say I agree with your thoughts, although if this season is like the last few years there will be an above average number of named storms, which confuses me a little in your post. Now in terms of threatening cyclones, yes there have been few during the past few years, at least for the CONUS. I expect an above average number of storms this season with some threats to the CONUS and islands of the Caribbean, and lean to Dr. Gray' ideas for an earlier start to the season. Dr. Gray will probably lower his storm predictions in April to 11 or 12, then raise them again in June (depending, of course, on the strength of the anticipated El Nino). BTW, has the Navy model been upgraded lately? Just curious since I figure you'd be in the know. Still 3 months to go! Cheers!!


New warning timings from NHC (#13)
Posted by: Jim M Location: Kissimmee
Posted On 12:54PM 19-Mar-2002 with id (QRNSTNRTVNSU*)
Don't know if anyone has seen this article at the Orlando Sentinel:
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/orl-alert03192002.story?coll=orl%2Dhome%2Dheadlines

I saw this and went, "Oh no!" Expanding Hurricane warnings out to five days in advance could be a PR nightmare considering the error in these forecasts. Anyone else share the opinion that a five day warning is ill-advised becuase we can not forecast these storms well enough for a five day warning?


Nice website ! (#14)
Posted by: John Location: South Florida
Posted On 02:56PM 19-Mar-2002 with id (RPYNRTPNRRRNQSP*)
(Click here) http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/~timo/sunclodk.htm


Excuse me (#15)
Posted by: John Location: South Florida
Posted On 03:01PM 19-Mar-2002 with id (RPYNRTPNRRRNQSP*)
(click here)http://www.cru.uea.acu.uk/~timo/sunclock.htm



Post a comment | Show All Comments | Show Next 14 Comments


Return to Central Florida Hurricane Center Main Page