Current Radar or Satellite Image

Flhurricane.com - Central Florida Hurricane Center - Tracking Storms since 1995Hurricanes Without the Hype! Since 1995


The Atlantic is quiet
Days since last H. Landfall - US: Any 43 (Milton) , Major: 43 (Milton) Florida - Any: 43 (Milton) Major: 43 (Milton)
 


General Discussion >> Hurricane Ask/Tell

Pages: 1
DavidUK
Registered User


Reged:
Posts: 1
Most Powerful Possible hurricane?
      #60985 - Fri Oct 21 2005 08:28 PM

Hi everyone, I have a question, which is probably really simple to most, but its something i have been wondering for a few days. I know on the SS scale that a cat 5 hurricane is the most powerful. And from what i have learnt from this site, just under 200mph winds are the most powerful recorded. However, is it possible that a hurricane could form with 250 mph winds etc....or is there a natural limit to the size/power a hurricane can get? Is the limit, perhaps the temperature of the sea where the hurricane forms/travels? If global warming means the gulf of mexico waters get warmer, will this create more powerful hurricanes, or just more of them?

Well thanks for your time, and i hope you can answer my questions!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Geoff
Weather Hobbyist


Reged:
Posts: 50
Loc: Tampa, FL
Re: Most Powerful Possible hurricane? [Re: DavidUK]
      #61027 - Fri Oct 21 2005 09:06 PM

Here is a site that may be of interest regarding minimum potential pressure and maximum wind speed.

http://wxmaps.org/pix/hurpot.html


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
CaneTrackerInSoFl
Storm Tracker


Reged:
Posts: 395
Loc: Israel
Re: Most Powerful Possible hurricane? [Re: Geoff]
      #61078 - Fri Oct 21 2005 10:01 PM

There is the theoretical HyperCane which would form in superheated waters, i.e. in the event of a large asteroid hit in the ocean. Wind speeds would be in excess of 300 mph. Damage would be total. I believe an example of a hypercane is the Red Eye of Jupiter.



This is just a theory, mind you, based off of paleontological evidence.

--------------------
Andrew 1992, Irene 1999, Katrina 2005, Wilma 2005



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Lysis
User


Reged:
Posts: 451
Loc: Hong Kong
Re: Most Powerful Possible hurricane? [Re: CaneTrackerInSoFl]
      #63745 - Fri Nov 18 2005 04:22 PM

The Great Red Spot, aye? It is actually an anticyclone I think (yes, it does move counter clockwise… but in the wrong hemisphere). I don’t know how you can guestimate winds though, especially on a planet that has no actual surface as a reference point.

--------------------
cheers

Edited by Lysis (Fri Nov 18 2005 04:23 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
HanKFranK
User


Reged:
Posts: 1841
Loc: Graniteville, SC
five dollar answer to a ten-cent question [Re: Lysis]
      #63981 - Fri Nov 25 2005 02:55 AM

there have been conjectures made as to a theoretical threshold of hurricane strength in a GW world. the thing is, the IPCC guys won't go further and say anything about whether such storms are possible since there isn't any science to back it up. there are lots of signals that can mix things up, and considering how good of a job current dedicated hurricane models do (i.e., the top-dog GFDL in all of its glory creating monster hurricanes and then open waves from run to run)... and that the global warming models in existence are trying to model a much more complex system at extremely coarse, global resolution... it's safe to say that no empirical evidence for stronger storms exists.
global warming is an agenda mechanism for the global change community--which is a weird mix of scientists and international bureaucrats who are both do-gooders and control freaks at the same time. dependent on what your politics are, you either like these guys and think they're going to save us all, or wish they'd spend their money researching things without the purpose of finding evidence that people are altering the earth and more about how it actually works, sans the agenda. the agenda is of course to regulate the power of nations by dictating what they can and can't do, and bring more of the world's management under the cloak of the UN-types. with the issue as politicized as it is, it's really hard to get at the truth of what's really going on with the world's climate. both sides want you to believe their story so that their agenda can go forward.. not because it's fact or bad science-fiction. and of course the fact is nobody REALLY understands it well enough to call heads or tails.

as a climate scientist in training, what i can say is this:
the earth is really really really complex. there are all kinds of built-in controls.. i.e. global warming can lead to global cooling by increasing glacial meltwater, shutting down poleward heat flow, and creating compounding feedbacks like colder temperatures, more snowfall, and higher albedo from the snowfall which compounds the effect. this is a negative feedback. their are positive feedbacks as well--i.e. higher co2 leads to more warming, and increases the water vapor content further increasing heat retention. upscale these processes to the patchwork different surfaces, and the complex heat transport in the atmosphere and ocean, and it makes for some pretty complex problems.
but anyway, at shorter timescales, we do get temporary warming and cooling periods in parts of the globe. you're familiar with el nino? it puts parts of the pacific into tropical overdrive, and turns the atlantic into a whisper. not to mention reworks the weather patterns over much of the world. will global warming lead to more hurricanes in some places and fewer in others.. you betcha. has the earth existed in modes warmer and colder than the current one? yep. we're in an interglacial warm spell, but when viewed at larger timescales its really friggen cold, compared to much of the earth's history. personally i hope that global warming acts as a buffer to prevent the coming ice age that we are on a course for, as the earth's orbital and solar forcing parameters are inevitably sliding that way over thousands of years. the last interglacial peaked early and slowly, in swoops and dives. it put much of the northern hemisphere under an ice sheet, and made the earth a place that was generally colder and drier than our world. the population our relatively warmer planet supports today would be culled and starved into a fragment, were an ice age to befall people not equipped to handle it.
man, i'll take global warming any day, if you ask me. it's really pick your poison.. unless you happen to think that people can modulate the climate outside of the inevitable natural cycles over the ages. we don't know if it is possible yet, but we're going to find out... one way or another.
probably not in my lifetime.
HF 0754z25november


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1



Extra information
0 registered and 77 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 5933

Rate this topic

Jump to

Note: This is NOT an official page. It is run by weather hobbyists and should not be used as a replacement for official sources. 
CFHC's main servers are currently located at
Hostdime.com in Orlando, FL.
Image Server Network thanks to Mike Potts and Amazon Web Services. If you have static file hosting space that allows dns aliasing contact us to help out! Some Maps Provided by:
Great thanks to all who donated and everyone who uses the site as well. Site designed for 800x600+ resolution
When in doubt, take the word of the National Hurricane Center