Know we all love to criticize and complain around here regarding what we consider less than accurate or wonderful discussion from both TWC and NHC but this morning's tropical updates by John?? at TWC have been nothing short of wonderful... fast paced, lots of info, good discussion as opposed to reformatting of NHC discussion... worth the time both times I saw it.. on occaision go out of my way to catch him early in the morning and rest of the day mute you know who..
next...
jarvinen's discussion was one of the most enjoyable ive ever read..felt like it was written by a person not a program.. showed the reality of what you see vs what the models are predicting and tho erring on the side of caution (w/o dropsondes...) gave good discussion on probable strength of Isabel and reasoning for keeping it at lower number for the next few hours.
excellent...
both of them... a real joy to be tracking with that type of discussion
like to see some discussion here on how Juan plays into all of this and could someone post the link please to the NASA pics..
Forum Permissions
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled
UBBCode is enabled
Rating:
Thread views: 67839
Note: This is NOT an official page. It is run by weather hobbyists and should not be used as a replacement for official sources.
CFHC's main servers are currently located at Hostdime.com in Orlando, FL.
Image Server Network thanks to Mike Potts and Amazon Web Services. If you have static file hosting space that allows dns aliasing contact us to help out! Some Maps Provided by:
Great thanks to all who donated and everyone who uses the site as well.
Site designed for 800x600+ resolution
When in doubt, take the word of the National Hurricane Center
Previous
Index
Next
Flat
A time for compliments...
Edit
Reply
Quote
