F
Current Radar or Satellite Image

Flhurricane.com - Central Florida Hurricane Center - Tracking Storms since 1995Hurricanes Without the Hype! Since 1995


First day of the Atlantic Hurricane season, no tropical activity on the horizon in the near term. Mid August is usually when things pick up.
Days since last H. Landfall - US: Any 285 (Idalia) , Major: 285 (Idalia) Florida - Any: 285 (Idalia) Major: 285 (Idalia)
 


News Talkback >> 2002 News Articles and Talkback

Kevin
Weather Master


Reged:
Posts: 524
Loc: EC Florida
Re: To Be or Not To Be?
      Mon Sep 16 2002 11:35 PM

My thinking is that the Bahamas may feel very little effect from this system. I'm still thinking it should keep moving towards the wnw at 10-15 mph for at least the next 36h.

Analog storms: I've picked out some storms that seem to be at least somewhat similar to this one. Although some formed in different places, I believe with one of the storms the outcome may be the same as with this one.

http://weather.unisys.com/hurricaen/atlantic/1944/11/track.gif
This track looks like the most similar to this storm at this time. This storm was never a quick mover and effected western Cuba as a hurricane but then weakened as it went over. When it emerged over water, it was moving slowly but it re-intensified into a category 3 hurricane. Looks quite similar to this one.

http://weather.unisys.com/hurricane/atlantic/1953/FLORENCE/track.gif
This one formed in a similar place to the 1944 storm but tracked further west. This has a much lower chance of being similar to our current storm than the 1944 one does. The trough that should effect this system looks to be very sharp. Shouldn't allow this one to get up to the Florida Panhandle.

Of course, there could be some variations in intensity. Another thing I wanted to point out: It seems whenever we have a tropical wave producing tropical storm forced winds but with no closed circulation we eventually see development. It also seems that these storms don't tend to stop developing when they hit land. With Erin in 1995, it was a rainmaker for the Florida Peninsula but when it hit the Florida Panhandle wind damage was far greater than with Erin's first hit. Wil this storm be the same way? Rainfall a main threat in Cuba with wind being the main threat in Florida. Time will tell.

Also, in years similar to this one where activity is pushed closer to the US and more numerous in the GOMEX it seems Florida always get a cat.2 or cat.3 from the south. Just a trend I noticed from some years.

Kevin

Post Extras Print Post   Remind Me!     Notify Moderator


Entire topic
Subject Posted by Posted on
* To Be or Not To Be? CFHCAdministrator Mon Sep 16 2002 11:35 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 09:58 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 08:55 PM
. * * Not YET Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 08:58 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 08:51 PM
. * * td 10/11 HanKFranK   Tue Sep 17 2002 09:00 PM
. * * Re: td 10/11 Joe   Tue Sep 17 2002 09:12 PM
. * * Re: td 10/11 Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 09:17 PM
. * * Re: td 10/11 Joe   Tue Sep 17 2002 09:19 PM
. * * Td 10 Kevin   Tue Sep 17 2002 09:52 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 08:37 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? andy1tom   Tue Sep 17 2002 08:44 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Rich B   Tue Sep 17 2002 08:46 PM
. * * TD# 11 Discussion Mike   Tue Sep 17 2002 08:52 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 02:56 AM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? medic8ed   Tue Sep 17 2002 02:10 AM
. * * WHERE IT GOES?? WXMAN RICHIE   Tue Sep 17 2002 02:16 AM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 02:05 AM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:54 AM
. * * no telling HanKFranK   Tue Sep 17 2002 01:11 AM
. * * Re: no telling troy2   Tue Sep 17 2002 03:57 AM
. * * Re: no telling Domino1   Tue Sep 17 2002 04:32 AM
. * * Re: no telling Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 04:08 AM
. * * Re: Direct TV Domino1   Tue Sep 17 2002 04:35 AM
. * * recon HanKFranK   Tue Sep 17 2002 04:48 AM
. * * Re: recon doug   Tue Sep 17 2002 09:33 AM
. * * Re: recon Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 01:50 PM
. * * Re: recon garyb   Tue Sep 17 2002 01:44 PM
. * * Re: recon Mike   Tue Sep 17 2002 01:50 PM
. * * Re: recon Marktropic   Tue Sep 17 2002 03:48 PM
. * * Movine west? Southern4sure   Tue Sep 17 2002 02:04 PM
. * * Re: Movine west? Rasvar   Tue Sep 17 2002 02:47 PM
. * * Re: Movine west? Mike   Tue Sep 17 2002 02:49 PM
. * * Re: Movine west? Rasvar   Tue Sep 17 2002 03:19 PM
. * * Re: recon garyb   Tue Sep 17 2002 01:56 PM
. * * Re: recon Mike   Tue Sep 17 2002 02:02 PM
. * * Re: recon Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 01:42 PM
. * * Re: recon Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 01:40 PM
. * * TD Ten is back! Rich B   Tue Sep 17 2002 01:45 PM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! garyb   Tue Sep 17 2002 01:49 PM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! troy2   Tue Sep 17 2002 05:49 PM
. * * getting ready to explode Rick in Mobile   Tue Sep 17 2002 06:05 PM
. * * Re: getting ready to explode Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 06:21 PM
. * * Re: getting ready to explode John C   Tue Sep 17 2002 06:56 PM
. * * Re: getting ready to explode Colleen A.   Tue Sep 17 2002 07:06 PM
. * * Re: getting ready to explode Joe   Tue Sep 17 2002 06:47 PM
. * * Re: getting ready to explode Colleen A.   Tue Sep 17 2002 07:02 PM
. * * Re: getting ready to explode Joe   Tue Sep 17 2002 07:05 PM
. * * May I present.... Rasvar   Tue Sep 17 2002 06:58 PM
. * * Re: May I present.... Colleen A.   Tue Sep 17 2002 07:04 PM
. * * Re: May I present.... Rasvar   Tue Sep 17 2002 07:07 PM
. * * transgendered systems HanKFranK   Tue Sep 17 2002 07:43 PM
. * * Re: transgendered systems Rich B   Tue Sep 17 2002 08:05 PM
. * * TD#11 at 5 PM Cycloneye   Tue Sep 17 2002 07:49 PM
. * * How rude. Rasvar   Tue Sep 17 2002 07:02 PM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 05:55 PM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! troy2   Tue Sep 17 2002 05:46 PM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! troy2   Tue Sep 17 2002 05:09 PM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 05:06 PM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! Colleen A.   Tue Sep 17 2002 05:57 PM
. * * games HanKFranK   Tue Sep 17 2002 06:09 PM
. * * Re: games Hurric   Tue Sep 17 2002 06:20 PM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! scottsvb   Tue Sep 17 2002 05:10 PM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! Rich B   Tue Sep 17 2002 05:17 PM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! andy1tom   Tue Sep 17 2002 05:39 PM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! troy2   Tue Sep 17 2002 04:39 PM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! troy2   Tue Sep 17 2002 04:37 PM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! troy2   Tue Sep 17 2002 04:33 PM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 04:10 PM
. * * 33/52 HanKFranK   Tue Sep 17 2002 04:18 PM
. * * On Track? scottsvb   Tue Sep 17 2002 04:54 PM
. * * Re: On Track? Marktropic   Tue Sep 17 2002 05:20 PM
. * * track HanKFranK   Tue Sep 17 2002 05:44 PM
. * * Re: track Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 07:51 PM
. * * Td 10 (future Isidore) track Kevin   Tue Sep 17 2002 08:05 PM
. * * Re: Td 10 (future Isidore) track brew   Tue Sep 17 2002 08:30 PM
. * * Kevin clyde w   Tue Sep 17 2002 10:19 PM
. * * Tallahassee Bill Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 10:51 PM
. * * Re: track Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 07:45 PM
. * * 11 noname Alan   Tue Sep 17 2002 07:39 PM
. * * Re: On Track? Marktropic   Tue Sep 17 2002 05:37 PM
. * * Re: 33/52 Mary   Tue Sep 17 2002 04:37 PM
. * * Re: 33/52 Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 04:47 PM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! Rich B   Tue Sep 17 2002 01:47 PM
. * * Why Not A Test ? garyb   Tue Sep 17 2002 01:39 PM
. * * Re: Why Not A Test ? Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 09:48 PM
. * * No Storm Yet garyb   Tue Sep 17 2002 01:34 PM
. * * Re: recon Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 01:33 PM
. * * Re: recon clyde w.   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:27 PM
. * * Re: recon RBL   Tue Sep 17 2002 01:34 PM
. * * Re: recon Rick in Mobile   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:11 PM
. * * Isadore?? clyde w.   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:11 PM
. * * Re: recon Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 11:52 AM
. * * Re: recon Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 11:49 AM
. * * Re: recon Rasvar   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:09 PM
. * * Re: recon Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 11:23 AM
. * * bingo *DELETED* HanKFranK   Tue Sep 17 2002 11:35 AM
. * * what the.. HanKFranK   Tue Sep 17 2002 11:36 AM
. * * 32/52 HanKFranK   Tue Sep 17 2002 11:39 AM
. * * bingo HanKFranK   Tue Sep 17 2002 11:33 AM
. * * Re: recon Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 10:50 AM
. * * Re: recon Domino   Tue Sep 17 2002 09:50 AM
. * * Re: recon 57497479   Tue Sep 17 2002 10:26 AM
. * * Re: recon BabyCat   Tue Sep 17 2002 10:36 AM
. * * Re: no telling troy2   Tue Sep 17 2002 03:52 AM
. * * Re: no telling Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 03:54 AM
. * * Re: no telling troy2   Tue Sep 17 2002 03:44 AM
. * * Re: no telling StormHound   Tue Sep 17 2002 03:54 AM
. * * Re: no telling RBL   Tue Sep 17 2002 03:53 AM
. * * Re: no telling troy2   Tue Sep 17 2002 03:32 AM
. * * Re: no telling StormHound   Tue Sep 17 2002 03:35 AM
. * * getting fun, ain't it? Rick in Mobile   Tue Sep 17 2002 03:06 AM
. * * Re: getting fun, ain't it? 57497479   Tue Sep 17 2002 03:16 AM
. * * LLCC? StormHound   Tue Sep 17 2002 03:22 AM
. * * Re: Any Ideas on Florida Impact? JustinMiami   Tue Sep 17 2002 02:57 AM
. * * Re: no telling Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 02:18 AM
. * * Re: no telling Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 01:31 AM
. * * TD 10???? WXMAN RICHIE   Tue Sep 17 2002 01:55 AM
. * * Re: no telling Anonymousnickd   Tue Sep 17 2002 01:21 AM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:26 AM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:21 AM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? troy2   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:20 AM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:12 AM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Joe   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:20 AM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:12 AM
. * * Re: Mark Kevin   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:21 AM
. * * Re: Mark Joe   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:27 AM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Anonymous   Mon Sep 16 2002 11:54 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? ShawnS   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:11 AM
. * * an early good night Robert   Mon Sep 16 2002 11:57 PM
. * * Re: an early good night Kevin   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:04 AM
. * * Re: an early good night Bruce   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:14 AM
. * * Re: an early good night Anonymousnickd   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:29 AM
. * * Re: an early good night Joe   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:34 AM
. * * discussion... Anonymousnickd   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:32 AM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? troy2   Mon Sep 16 2002 11:48 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Cycloneye   Mon Sep 16 2002 11:51 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? scottsvb   Mon Sep 16 2002 11:32 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Robert   Mon Sep 16 2002 11:18 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Kevin   Mon Sep 16 2002 11:35 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? ShawnS   Mon Sep 16 2002 11:42 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? StormHound   Mon Sep 16 2002 11:32 PM

Extra information
0 registered and 17 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  



Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Thread views: 20721

Rate this thread

Jump to

Note: This is NOT an official page. It is run by weather hobbyists and should not be used as a replacement for official sources. 
CFHC's main servers are currently located at Hostdime.com in Orlando, FL.
Image Server Network thanks to Mike Potts and Amazon Web Services. If you have static file hosting space that allows dns aliasing contact us to help out! Some Maps Provided by:
Great thanks to all who donated and everyone who uses the site as well. Site designed for 800x600+ resolution
When in doubt, take the word of the National Hurricane Center