F
Current Radar or Satellite Image

Flhurricane.com - Central Florida Hurricane Center - Tracking Storms since 1995Hurricanes Without the Hype! Since 1995


#93L now a small better defined circulation with deep convection set to come ashore N of Tampico, MX. Recon investigating. Still 40% odds.
Days since last H. Landfall - US: Any 299 (Idalia) , Major: 299 (Idalia) Florida - Any: 299 (Idalia) Major: 299 (Idalia)
 


News Talkback >> 2002 News Articles and Talkback

Marktropic
Unregistered




Re: recon
      Tue Sep 17 2002 11:48 AM

Well TD# 10 developes a bit more south than I thought last night. This does change things a bit but in what direction its unsure. The path forcasted should be a bit west of the previous one so western Cuba or eastern Yucatan is a possibility. Latest satellite pictures do show a LLCC with developing thundestorms on its east and north side. By 5pm I do expect T.S. Isidore. So where next? Read this and it will help:
BOTH THE AVN AND CANADIAN MODELS HINT AT
REDEVELOPMENT OF A CENTER ALONG THE NORTH COAST OF CUBA UNDERNEATH
THE MOST FAVORABLE UPPER-ENVIRONMENT. THIS SCENARIO SEEMS UNLIKELY.
THE NOGAPS AND GFDL WANT TO TAKE THE DEPRESSION NORTHWARD OVER
CENTRAL AND WESTERN CUBA...RESPECTIVELY. THE OFFICIAL FORECAST
SHOWS A SOFTER NORTHWESTWARD TURN IN AN ATTEMPT TO BE MORE
CONSISTENT WITH THE 500 MB AVN AND UKMET LARGE SCALE FORECAST
FIELDS. PERHAPS COINCIDENTALLY...THIS FORECAST IS IN GOOD AGREEMENT
WITH THE BAM AND LBAR MODELS.

So I believe the forcast track will change over the next 24 hours to the east and how far will have towait. As for TD#10 moving west I don't think it is its moving w-nw but very slow and thats another problem so read this:
BECAUSE THE CIRCULATION CENTER IS NEW...THE INITIAL MOTION IS VERY
UNCERTAIN...BUT THE BEST ESTIMATE IS 270/8...PERHAPS LESS.
So we will wait and see at 5pm when new more reliable information is out until we get down to exact track.



Post Extras Print Post   Remind Me!     Notify Moderator


Entire topic
Subject Posted by Posted on
* To Be or Not To Be? CFHCAdministrator Tue Sep 17 2002 11:48 AM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 05:58 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 04:55 PM
. * * Not YET Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 04:58 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 04:51 PM
. * * td 10/11 HanKFranK   Tue Sep 17 2002 05:00 PM
. * * Re: td 10/11 Joe   Tue Sep 17 2002 05:12 PM
. * * Re: td 10/11 Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 05:17 PM
. * * Re: td 10/11 Joe   Tue Sep 17 2002 05:19 PM
. * * Td 10 Kevin   Tue Sep 17 2002 05:52 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 04:37 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? andy1tom   Tue Sep 17 2002 04:44 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Rich B   Tue Sep 17 2002 04:46 PM
. * * TD# 11 Discussion Mike   Tue Sep 17 2002 04:52 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Anonymous   Mon Sep 16 2002 10:56 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? medic8ed   Mon Sep 16 2002 10:10 PM
. * * WHERE IT GOES?? WXMAN RICHIE   Mon Sep 16 2002 10:16 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Anonymous   Mon Sep 16 2002 10:05 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Anonymous   Mon Sep 16 2002 08:54 PM
. * * no telling HanKFranK   Mon Sep 16 2002 09:11 PM
. * * Re: no telling troy2   Mon Sep 16 2002 11:57 PM
. * * Re: no telling Domino1   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:32 AM
. * * Re: no telling Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:08 AM
. * * Re: Direct TV Domino1   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:35 AM
. * * recon HanKFranK   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:48 AM
. * * Re: recon doug   Tue Sep 17 2002 05:33 AM
. * * Re: recon Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 09:50 AM
. * * Re: recon garyb   Tue Sep 17 2002 09:44 AM
. * * Re: recon Mike   Tue Sep 17 2002 09:50 AM
. * * Re: recon Marktropic   Tue Sep 17 2002 11:48 AM
. * * Movine west? Southern4sure   Tue Sep 17 2002 10:04 AM
. * * Re: Movine west? Rasvar   Tue Sep 17 2002 10:47 AM
. * * Re: Movine west? Mike   Tue Sep 17 2002 10:49 AM
. * * Re: Movine west? Rasvar   Tue Sep 17 2002 11:19 AM
. * * Re: recon garyb   Tue Sep 17 2002 09:56 AM
. * * Re: recon Mike   Tue Sep 17 2002 10:02 AM
. * * Re: recon Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 09:42 AM
. * * Re: recon Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 09:40 AM
. * * TD Ten is back! Rich B   Tue Sep 17 2002 09:45 AM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! garyb   Tue Sep 17 2002 09:49 AM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! troy2   Tue Sep 17 2002 01:49 PM
. * * getting ready to explode Rick in Mobile   Tue Sep 17 2002 02:05 PM
. * * Re: getting ready to explode Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 02:21 PM
. * * Re: getting ready to explode John C   Tue Sep 17 2002 02:56 PM
. * * Re: getting ready to explode Colleen A.   Tue Sep 17 2002 03:06 PM
. * * Re: getting ready to explode Joe   Tue Sep 17 2002 02:47 PM
. * * Re: getting ready to explode Colleen A.   Tue Sep 17 2002 03:02 PM
. * * Re: getting ready to explode Joe   Tue Sep 17 2002 03:05 PM
. * * May I present.... Rasvar   Tue Sep 17 2002 02:58 PM
. * * Re: May I present.... Colleen A.   Tue Sep 17 2002 03:04 PM
. * * Re: May I present.... Rasvar   Tue Sep 17 2002 03:07 PM
. * * transgendered systems HanKFranK   Tue Sep 17 2002 03:43 PM
. * * Re: transgendered systems Rich B   Tue Sep 17 2002 04:05 PM
. * * TD#11 at 5 PM Cycloneye   Tue Sep 17 2002 03:49 PM
. * * How rude. Rasvar   Tue Sep 17 2002 03:02 PM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 01:55 PM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! troy2   Tue Sep 17 2002 01:46 PM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! troy2   Tue Sep 17 2002 01:09 PM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 01:06 PM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! Colleen A.   Tue Sep 17 2002 01:57 PM
. * * games HanKFranK   Tue Sep 17 2002 02:09 PM
. * * Re: games Hurric   Tue Sep 17 2002 02:20 PM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! scottsvb   Tue Sep 17 2002 01:10 PM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! Rich B   Tue Sep 17 2002 01:17 PM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! andy1tom   Tue Sep 17 2002 01:39 PM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! troy2   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:39 PM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! troy2   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:37 PM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! troy2   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:33 PM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:10 PM
. * * 33/52 HanKFranK   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:18 PM
. * * On Track? scottsvb   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:54 PM
. * * Re: On Track? Marktropic   Tue Sep 17 2002 01:20 PM
. * * track HanKFranK   Tue Sep 17 2002 01:44 PM
. * * Re: track Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 03:51 PM
. * * Td 10 (future Isidore) track Kevin   Tue Sep 17 2002 04:05 PM
. * * Re: Td 10 (future Isidore) track brew   Tue Sep 17 2002 04:30 PM
. * * Kevin clyde w   Tue Sep 17 2002 06:19 PM
. * * Tallahassee Bill Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 06:51 PM
. * * Re: track Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 03:45 PM
. * * 11 noname Alan   Tue Sep 17 2002 03:39 PM
. * * Re: On Track? Marktropic   Tue Sep 17 2002 01:37 PM
. * * Re: 33/52 Mary   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:37 PM
. * * Re: 33/52 Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:47 PM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! Rich B   Tue Sep 17 2002 09:47 AM
. * * Why Not A Test ? garyb   Tue Sep 17 2002 09:39 AM
. * * Re: Why Not A Test ? Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 05:48 PM
. * * No Storm Yet garyb   Tue Sep 17 2002 09:34 AM
. * * Re: recon Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 09:33 AM
. * * Re: recon clyde w.   Tue Sep 17 2002 08:27 AM
. * * Re: recon RBL   Tue Sep 17 2002 09:34 AM
. * * Re: recon Rick in Mobile   Tue Sep 17 2002 08:11 AM
. * * Isadore?? clyde w.   Tue Sep 17 2002 08:11 AM
. * * Re: recon Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 07:52 AM
. * * Re: recon Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 07:49 AM
. * * Re: recon Rasvar   Tue Sep 17 2002 08:09 AM
. * * Re: recon Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 07:23 AM
. * * bingo *DELETED* HanKFranK   Tue Sep 17 2002 07:35 AM
. * * what the.. HanKFranK   Tue Sep 17 2002 07:36 AM
. * * 32/52 HanKFranK   Tue Sep 17 2002 07:39 AM
. * * bingo HanKFranK   Tue Sep 17 2002 07:33 AM
. * * Re: recon Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 06:50 AM
. * * Re: recon Domino   Tue Sep 17 2002 05:50 AM
. * * Re: recon 57497479   Tue Sep 17 2002 06:26 AM
. * * Re: recon BabyCat   Tue Sep 17 2002 06:36 AM
. * * Re: no telling troy2   Mon Sep 16 2002 11:52 PM
. * * Re: no telling Anonymous   Mon Sep 16 2002 11:54 PM
. * * Re: no telling troy2   Mon Sep 16 2002 11:44 PM
. * * Re: no telling StormHound   Mon Sep 16 2002 11:54 PM
. * * Re: no telling RBL   Mon Sep 16 2002 11:53 PM
. * * Re: no telling troy2   Mon Sep 16 2002 11:32 PM
. * * Re: no telling StormHound   Mon Sep 16 2002 11:35 PM
. * * getting fun, ain't it? Rick in Mobile   Mon Sep 16 2002 11:06 PM
. * * Re: getting fun, ain't it? 57497479   Mon Sep 16 2002 11:16 PM
. * * LLCC? StormHound   Mon Sep 16 2002 11:22 PM
. * * Re: Any Ideas on Florida Impact? JustinMiami   Mon Sep 16 2002 10:57 PM
. * * Re: no telling Anonymous   Mon Sep 16 2002 10:18 PM
. * * Re: no telling Anonymous   Mon Sep 16 2002 09:31 PM
. * * TD 10???? WXMAN RICHIE   Mon Sep 16 2002 09:55 PM
. * * Re: no telling Anonymousnickd   Mon Sep 16 2002 09:21 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Anonymous   Mon Sep 16 2002 08:26 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Anonymous   Mon Sep 16 2002 08:21 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? troy2   Mon Sep 16 2002 08:20 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Anonymous   Mon Sep 16 2002 08:12 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Joe   Mon Sep 16 2002 08:20 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Anonymous   Mon Sep 16 2002 08:12 PM
. * * Re: Mark Kevin   Mon Sep 16 2002 08:21 PM
. * * Re: Mark Joe   Mon Sep 16 2002 08:27 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Anonymous   Mon Sep 16 2002 07:54 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? ShawnS   Mon Sep 16 2002 08:11 PM
. * * an early good night Robert   Mon Sep 16 2002 07:57 PM
. * * Re: an early good night Kevin   Mon Sep 16 2002 08:04 PM
. * * Re: an early good night Bruce   Mon Sep 16 2002 08:14 PM
. * * Re: an early good night Anonymousnickd   Mon Sep 16 2002 08:29 PM
. * * Re: an early good night Joe   Mon Sep 16 2002 08:34 PM
. * * discussion... Anonymousnickd   Mon Sep 16 2002 08:32 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? troy2   Mon Sep 16 2002 07:48 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Cycloneye   Mon Sep 16 2002 07:51 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? scottsvb   Mon Sep 16 2002 07:32 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Robert   Mon Sep 16 2002 07:18 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Kevin   Mon Sep 16 2002 07:35 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? ShawnS   Mon Sep 16 2002 07:42 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? StormHound   Mon Sep 16 2002 07:32 PM

Extra information
0 registered and 183 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  



Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Thread views: 20878

Rate this thread

Jump to

Note: This is NOT an official page. It is run by weather hobbyists and should not be used as a replacement for official sources. 
CFHC's main servers are currently located at Hostdime.com in Orlando, FL.
Image Server Network thanks to Mike Potts and Amazon Web Services. If you have static file hosting space that allows dns aliasing contact us to help out! Some Maps Provided by:
Great thanks to all who donated and everyone who uses the site as well. Site designed for 800x600+ resolution
When in doubt, take the word of the National Hurricane Center