F
Current Radar or Satellite Image

Flhurricane.com - Central Florida Hurricane Center - Tracking Storms since 1995Hurricanes Without the Hype! Since 1995


Invest 94L just northeast of the ABC islands in the Caribbean moving west, 20% development chance. Another area near the Cabo Verde islands has a 20% chance to develop over the next 7 days.
Days since last H. Landfall - US: Any 301 (Idalia) , Major: 301 (Idalia) Florida - Any: 301 (Idalia) Major: 301 (Idalia)
 


News Talkback >> 2002 News Articles and Talkback

scottsvb
Weather Master


Reged:
Posts: 1184
Loc: fl
On Track?
      Tue Sep 17 2002 12:54 PM

General Conditions of TD is fairly weak. We have recon giving back reports of a still weak 1009mb pressure. No winds right now are as strong as yesterday. Does that mean the system is weaker? Infact NO of course not. Yesterday the system was crusing along near 20K and with the T-storms on its NE side of 20-30mph it relivates to a tropical storm force winds. But overall the structure is alittle better due to the slowing down of the system as it loses the strong driving ridge to its N. Now the TWC mets been talkiing about the T-Storms creating there own enviroment decreasing the sheer. Where did they learn that from? I cant believe they are tell you guys that. Only the most strongest Hurricanes with pressures under 925mb or so will create a strong enough upper flow, and there still is sheer though not as strong in TD10 right now. The only reason there is not as much is due to the TS losing the speed of the ridge while the upper low to its NW continues to the W.
Forcast remains the same. With a weaker system a west movement will happen with the low level flow. When the system gets better organized with pressures around 1005mb or so it will get pulled by the mid level flow which is out of the ESE causing a WNW movement. Currently the system is getting better though Im not sure if it will be upgraded to a TS by 5pm. Waiting on another recon. My forcast is still on track as post sw of Jamaica later today and tonight to near G cayman island on weds. My cross over was near 81 W and will be adjusted slightly W. I dont expect much of a W track into the Yucitan though it might get close if the system doesnt intensify early on it the forcast period. Finally be off the Sw coast of Florida on early Friday as a strong cat 1 or 2. We are all up in the air on intensity. Track is pretty well on, but we have time to see what happens to U.S landfall over the next 48-72 hours to pinpoint. scottsvb HURRICANEUPDATECENTER

Post Extras Print Post   Remind Me!     Notify Moderator


Entire topic
Subject Posted by Posted on
* To Be or Not To Be? CFHCAdministrator Tue Sep 17 2002 12:54 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 05:58 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 04:55 PM
. * * Not YET Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 04:58 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 04:51 PM
. * * td 10/11 HanKFranK   Tue Sep 17 2002 05:00 PM
. * * Re: td 10/11 Joe   Tue Sep 17 2002 05:12 PM
. * * Re: td 10/11 Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 05:17 PM
. * * Re: td 10/11 Joe   Tue Sep 17 2002 05:19 PM
. * * Td 10 Kevin   Tue Sep 17 2002 05:52 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 04:37 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? andy1tom   Tue Sep 17 2002 04:44 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Rich B   Tue Sep 17 2002 04:46 PM
. * * TD# 11 Discussion Mike   Tue Sep 17 2002 04:52 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Anonymous   Mon Sep 16 2002 10:56 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? medic8ed   Mon Sep 16 2002 10:10 PM
. * * WHERE IT GOES?? WXMAN RICHIE   Mon Sep 16 2002 10:16 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Anonymous   Mon Sep 16 2002 10:05 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Anonymous   Mon Sep 16 2002 08:54 PM
. * * no telling HanKFranK   Mon Sep 16 2002 09:11 PM
. * * Re: no telling troy2   Mon Sep 16 2002 11:57 PM
. * * Re: no telling Domino1   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:32 AM
. * * Re: no telling Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:08 AM
. * * Re: Direct TV Domino1   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:35 AM
. * * recon HanKFranK   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:48 AM
. * * Re: recon doug   Tue Sep 17 2002 05:33 AM
. * * Re: recon Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 09:50 AM
. * * Re: recon garyb   Tue Sep 17 2002 09:44 AM
. * * Re: recon Mike   Tue Sep 17 2002 09:50 AM
. * * Re: recon Marktropic   Tue Sep 17 2002 11:48 AM
. * * Movine west? Southern4sure   Tue Sep 17 2002 10:04 AM
. * * Re: Movine west? Rasvar   Tue Sep 17 2002 10:47 AM
. * * Re: Movine west? Mike   Tue Sep 17 2002 10:49 AM
. * * Re: Movine west? Rasvar   Tue Sep 17 2002 11:19 AM
. * * Re: recon garyb   Tue Sep 17 2002 09:56 AM
. * * Re: recon Mike   Tue Sep 17 2002 10:02 AM
. * * Re: recon Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 09:42 AM
. * * Re: recon Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 09:40 AM
. * * TD Ten is back! Rich B   Tue Sep 17 2002 09:45 AM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! garyb   Tue Sep 17 2002 09:49 AM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! troy2   Tue Sep 17 2002 01:49 PM
. * * getting ready to explode Rick in Mobile   Tue Sep 17 2002 02:05 PM
. * * Re: getting ready to explode Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 02:21 PM
. * * Re: getting ready to explode John C   Tue Sep 17 2002 02:56 PM
. * * Re: getting ready to explode Colleen A.   Tue Sep 17 2002 03:06 PM
. * * Re: getting ready to explode Joe   Tue Sep 17 2002 02:47 PM
. * * Re: getting ready to explode Colleen A.   Tue Sep 17 2002 03:02 PM
. * * Re: getting ready to explode Joe   Tue Sep 17 2002 03:05 PM
. * * May I present.... Rasvar   Tue Sep 17 2002 02:58 PM
. * * Re: May I present.... Colleen A.   Tue Sep 17 2002 03:04 PM
. * * Re: May I present.... Rasvar   Tue Sep 17 2002 03:07 PM
. * * transgendered systems HanKFranK   Tue Sep 17 2002 03:43 PM
. * * Re: transgendered systems Rich B   Tue Sep 17 2002 04:05 PM
. * * TD#11 at 5 PM Cycloneye   Tue Sep 17 2002 03:49 PM
. * * How rude. Rasvar   Tue Sep 17 2002 03:02 PM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 01:55 PM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! troy2   Tue Sep 17 2002 01:46 PM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! troy2   Tue Sep 17 2002 01:09 PM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 01:06 PM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! Colleen A.   Tue Sep 17 2002 01:57 PM
. * * games HanKFranK   Tue Sep 17 2002 02:09 PM
. * * Re: games Hurric   Tue Sep 17 2002 02:20 PM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! scottsvb   Tue Sep 17 2002 01:10 PM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! Rich B   Tue Sep 17 2002 01:17 PM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! andy1tom   Tue Sep 17 2002 01:39 PM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! troy2   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:39 PM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! troy2   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:37 PM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! troy2   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:33 PM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:10 PM
. * * 33/52 HanKFranK   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:18 PM
. * * On Track? scottsvb   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:54 PM
. * * Re: On Track? Marktropic   Tue Sep 17 2002 01:20 PM
. * * track HanKFranK   Tue Sep 17 2002 01:44 PM
. * * Re: track Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 03:51 PM
. * * Td 10 (future Isidore) track Kevin   Tue Sep 17 2002 04:05 PM
. * * Re: Td 10 (future Isidore) track brew   Tue Sep 17 2002 04:30 PM
. * * Kevin clyde w   Tue Sep 17 2002 06:19 PM
. * * Tallahassee Bill Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 06:51 PM
. * * Re: track Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 03:45 PM
. * * 11 noname Alan   Tue Sep 17 2002 03:39 PM
. * * Re: On Track? Marktropic   Tue Sep 17 2002 01:37 PM
. * * Re: 33/52 Mary   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:37 PM
. * * Re: 33/52 Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 12:47 PM
. * * Re: TD Ten is back! Rich B   Tue Sep 17 2002 09:47 AM
. * * Why Not A Test ? garyb   Tue Sep 17 2002 09:39 AM
. * * Re: Why Not A Test ? Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 05:48 PM
. * * No Storm Yet garyb   Tue Sep 17 2002 09:34 AM
. * * Re: recon Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 09:33 AM
. * * Re: recon clyde w.   Tue Sep 17 2002 08:27 AM
. * * Re: recon RBL   Tue Sep 17 2002 09:34 AM
. * * Re: recon Rick in Mobile   Tue Sep 17 2002 08:11 AM
. * * Isadore?? clyde w.   Tue Sep 17 2002 08:11 AM
. * * Re: recon Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 07:52 AM
. * * Re: recon Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 07:49 AM
. * * Re: recon Rasvar   Tue Sep 17 2002 08:09 AM
. * * Re: recon Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 07:23 AM
. * * bingo *DELETED* HanKFranK   Tue Sep 17 2002 07:35 AM
. * * what the.. HanKFranK   Tue Sep 17 2002 07:36 AM
. * * 32/52 HanKFranK   Tue Sep 17 2002 07:39 AM
. * * bingo HanKFranK   Tue Sep 17 2002 07:33 AM
. * * Re: recon Anonymous   Tue Sep 17 2002 06:50 AM
. * * Re: recon Domino   Tue Sep 17 2002 05:50 AM
. * * Re: recon 57497479   Tue Sep 17 2002 06:26 AM
. * * Re: recon BabyCat   Tue Sep 17 2002 06:36 AM
. * * Re: no telling troy2   Mon Sep 16 2002 11:52 PM
. * * Re: no telling Anonymous   Mon Sep 16 2002 11:54 PM
. * * Re: no telling troy2   Mon Sep 16 2002 11:44 PM
. * * Re: no telling StormHound   Mon Sep 16 2002 11:54 PM
. * * Re: no telling RBL   Mon Sep 16 2002 11:53 PM
. * * Re: no telling troy2   Mon Sep 16 2002 11:32 PM
. * * Re: no telling StormHound   Mon Sep 16 2002 11:35 PM
. * * getting fun, ain't it? Rick in Mobile   Mon Sep 16 2002 11:06 PM
. * * Re: getting fun, ain't it? 57497479   Mon Sep 16 2002 11:16 PM
. * * LLCC? StormHound   Mon Sep 16 2002 11:22 PM
. * * Re: Any Ideas on Florida Impact? JustinMiami   Mon Sep 16 2002 10:57 PM
. * * Re: no telling Anonymous   Mon Sep 16 2002 10:18 PM
. * * Re: no telling Anonymous   Mon Sep 16 2002 09:31 PM
. * * TD 10???? WXMAN RICHIE   Mon Sep 16 2002 09:55 PM
. * * Re: no telling Anonymousnickd   Mon Sep 16 2002 09:21 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Anonymous   Mon Sep 16 2002 08:26 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Anonymous   Mon Sep 16 2002 08:21 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? troy2   Mon Sep 16 2002 08:20 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Anonymous   Mon Sep 16 2002 08:12 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Joe   Mon Sep 16 2002 08:20 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Anonymous   Mon Sep 16 2002 08:12 PM
. * * Re: Mark Kevin   Mon Sep 16 2002 08:21 PM
. * * Re: Mark Joe   Mon Sep 16 2002 08:27 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Anonymous   Mon Sep 16 2002 07:54 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? ShawnS   Mon Sep 16 2002 08:11 PM
. * * an early good night Robert   Mon Sep 16 2002 07:57 PM
. * * Re: an early good night Kevin   Mon Sep 16 2002 08:04 PM
. * * Re: an early good night Bruce   Mon Sep 16 2002 08:14 PM
. * * Re: an early good night Anonymousnickd   Mon Sep 16 2002 08:29 PM
. * * Re: an early good night Joe   Mon Sep 16 2002 08:34 PM
. * * discussion... Anonymousnickd   Mon Sep 16 2002 08:32 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? troy2   Mon Sep 16 2002 07:48 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Cycloneye   Mon Sep 16 2002 07:51 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? scottsvb   Mon Sep 16 2002 07:32 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Robert   Mon Sep 16 2002 07:18 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? Kevin   Mon Sep 16 2002 07:35 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? ShawnS   Mon Sep 16 2002 07:42 PM
. * * Re: To Be or Not To Be? StormHound   Mon Sep 16 2002 07:32 PM

Extra information
0 registered and 74 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  



Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Thread views: 20898

Rate this thread

Jump to

Note: This is NOT an official page. It is run by weather hobbyists and should not be used as a replacement for official sources. 
CFHC's main servers are currently located at Hostdime.com in Orlando, FL.
Image Server Network thanks to Mike Potts and Amazon Web Services. If you have static file hosting space that allows dns aliasing contact us to help out! Some Maps Provided by:
Great thanks to all who donated and everyone who uses the site as well. Site designed for 800x600+ resolution
When in doubt, take the word of the National Hurricane Center