Ahhh... the difference isn't that significant regardless. Either way Clark… that prospect is absolutely incredible. I was thinking about how deep, in theory, the effects could propagate. I am reminded of a satellite image I found that features a massive area of the Gulf of Mexico with murky waters (well, more murky than the Gulf usually is anyway). It turns out that the mud on the bottom was actually churned up by hurricane Frances. And believe it. A lot of fish in the area have been reported to be abnormally large in size and in quantity. I continue to be amazed at such power.
0 registered and 394 anonymous users are browsing this forum.
Moderator:
Forum Permissions
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled
UBBCode is enabled
Rating:
Thread views: 149358
Note: This is NOT an official page. It is run by weather hobbyists and should not be used as a replacement for official sources.
CFHC's main servers are currently located at Hostdime.com in Orlando, FL.
Image Server Network thanks to Mike Potts and Amazon Web Services. If you have static file hosting space that allows dns aliasing contact us to help out! Some Maps Provided by:
Great thanks to all who donated and everyone who uses the site as well.
Site designed for 800x600+ resolution
When in doubt, take the word of the National Hurricane Center
Previous
Index
Next
Flat
Re: sat pics of emily
Edit
Reply
Quote
