F
Current Radar or Satellite Image

Flhurricane.com - Central Florida Hurricane Center - Tracking Storms since 1995Hurricanes Without the Hype! Since 1995


NHC advisories to begin shortly on Storm 01L (Potential Tropical Cyclone 01L) in the Western Gulf. Elsewhere, low east of Bahamas being tracked.
Days since last H. Landfall - US: Any 293 (Idalia) , Major: 293 (Idalia) Florida - Any: 293 (Idalia) Major: 293 (Idalia)
21.3N 93.0W
Wind: 40MPH
Pres: 999mb
Moving:
N at 6 mph
Click for Storm Spotlight
COMMUNICATION
STORM DATA
CONTENT
FOLLOW US
 


News Talkback >> 2005 News Talkbacks

typhoon_tip
Meteorologist


Reged:
Posts: 576
Re: latest TWO
      Tue Oct 25 2005 07:05 PM

Quote:

Typhoon Tip:

All the sites I use for SSTs are up. Here they are:

Navy: http://www7320.nrlssc.navy.mil/hhc/all_watl.html
NHC: http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/aboutsst.shtml

Rutgers (does not have the Carribean): http://marine.rutgers.edu/cool/sat_data/?product=sst&nothumbs=0

---

P.S. - take a look at this article (especially the 2nd page): http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9767275/




Thanks for sites! Yeah...i'm familiar with the controversies over the rating system....a similar debate erupted after the 312mph sustained vortex velocity wasmeasured in the 1999 Missouri tornado outbreak... Not sure it's ever gonna fly, however, because at the end of the day, we gotta ask our selves: what difference does it really make? 180mph winds and 200mph winds are so deep into the ends of catastrophe that it becomes splitting hairs defining whether something is merely obliterated versus denuded off the face of the planet - either way...no difference. I guess the debate gets more heated, however, as building technologies evolve to the point where they are theoretically designed to withstand the heavier assaults; in which case, a category 6 might have more meaning... But, until that time, anything over a 155mph sustained is for the most part going to get you to the same result: FUBAR!
just my opionion but i don't think the next category should be "6" per say...it should say "Maximum", because, believe it or not, there is a theoretical limitation to the amount of intensity a hurricane can have for terran based physics - those equations that must incorporate everthing from gravitation constants, latent heat availability and pressure dicontinuities (which ultimately give rise to differential advection patterns and even U/A mechanics such as anticyclonics for that matter...). There is an upper theoretical limit.... The trouble is, that limit is different for every environment so the Maximum category is more at universally intended; such as, a hurricane will never have winds of "300mph on Earth because it is physically impossible"... So for all plausibilities included, Maximum means anything that is virtually stronger than a category 5 because that category certainly approaches theoretical limitations to begin with. Maximum has a usefulness in the sense that it informs people that it is at the theoretical limitation of how awesome it can be....?

Post Extras Print Post   Remind Me!     Notify Moderator


Entire topic
Subject Posted by Posted on
* Hurricane Wilma Damage in South Florida MikeCAdministrator Tue Oct 25 2005 07:05 PM
. * * Re: Hurricane Wilma Damage in South Florida KC   Tue Oct 25 2005 09:30 PM
. * * Re: Hurricane Wilma Damage in South Florida trinibaje   Tue Oct 25 2005 03:43 PM
. * * Re: Hurricane Wilma Damage in South Florida tpratch   Tue Oct 25 2005 04:01 PM
. * * latest TWO Thunderbird12   Tue Oct 25 2005 04:14 PM
. * * Re: latest TWO typhoon_tip   Tue Oct 25 2005 04:50 PM
. * * Re: latest TWO ChessieStorm   Tue Oct 25 2005 06:22 PM
. * * Re: latest TWO typhoon_tip   Tue Oct 25 2005 07:10 PM
. * * Re: latest TWO Cindi   Tue Oct 25 2005 07:14 PM
. * * Re: latest TWO Wxwatcher2   Wed Oct 26 2005 02:02 AM
. * * Re: latest TWO collegemom   Wed Oct 26 2005 02:54 AM
. * * Re: latest TWO GoBigSurf   Wed Oct 26 2005 03:12 AM
. * * Re: latest TWO HanKFranK   Wed Oct 26 2005 05:24 AM
. * * Re: latest TWO Beaumont, TX   Wed Oct 26 2005 02:07 PM
. * * 90/91 HanKFranK   Wed Oct 26 2005 02:28 PM
. * * Re: 90/91 Thunderbird12   Wed Oct 26 2005 03:10 PM
. * * Re: latest TWO Random Chaos   Wed Oct 26 2005 11:34 AM
. * * Re: latest TWO Thunderbird12   Wed Oct 26 2005 02:27 PM
. * * Re: latest TWO Margie   Wed Oct 26 2005 04:35 AM
. * * Re: latest TWO Beaumont, TX   Wed Oct 26 2005 01:02 PM
. * * Re: latest TWO typhoon_tip   Tue Oct 25 2005 07:30 PM
. * * Re: latest TWO typhoon_tip   Tue Oct 25 2005 08:14 PM
. * * Re: latest TWO damejune2   Tue Oct 25 2005 08:54 PM
. * * Re: latest TWO Thunderbird12   Tue Oct 25 2005 09:28 PM
. * * Re: latest TWO scottsvb   Tue Oct 25 2005 06:32 PM
. * * Re: latest TWO Random Chaos   Tue Oct 25 2005 05:47 PM
. * * Re: latest TWO Convergence   Tue Oct 25 2005 08:50 PM
. * * Re: latest TWO Margie   Tue Oct 25 2005 08:16 PM
. * * Re: latest TWO Beaumont, TX   Wed Oct 26 2005 01:30 AM
. * * Re: latest TWO satellite steve   Wed Oct 26 2005 01:46 AM
. * * Rating storms Bloodstar   Tue Oct 25 2005 08:51 PM
. * * Re: Rating storms Margie   Tue Oct 25 2005 09:01 PM
. * * Re: latest TWO typhoon_tip   Tue Oct 25 2005 08:25 PM
. * * Re: latest TWO Margie   Tue Oct 25 2005 08:45 PM
. * * Re: latest TWO CoalCracker   Wed Oct 26 2005 12:31 AM
. * * Re: latest TWO NWBroward   Wed Oct 26 2005 01:28 AM
. * * Re: latest TWO Beaumont, TX   Wed Oct 26 2005 01:35 AM
. * * Re: latest TWO Beaumont, TX   Wed Oct 26 2005 12:54 AM
. * * Re: latest TWO FreakedInFlorida   Wed Oct 26 2005 01:05 AM
. * * Re: latest TWO Thunderbird12   Wed Oct 26 2005 01:12 AM
. * * Re: latest TWO CoalCracker   Wed Oct 26 2005 01:26 AM
. * * Re: latest TWO Beaumont, TX   Wed Oct 26 2005 01:11 AM
. * * Re: latest TWO satellite steve   Wed Oct 26 2005 02:02 AM
. * * Re: latest TWO satellite steve   Wed Oct 26 2005 12:54 AM
. * * Re: latest TWO KC   Tue Oct 25 2005 09:46 PM
. * * Re: latest TWO Katie   Tue Oct 25 2005 10:12 PM
. * * Picking up pieces Bloodstar   Tue Oct 25 2005 10:43 PM
. * * Re: Picking up pieces Random Chaos   Wed Oct 26 2005 12:42 AM
. * * New Systems? NONAME   Wed Oct 26 2005 12:31 AM
. * * Re: latest TWO typhoon_tip   Tue Oct 25 2005 09:23 PM
. * * Re: latest TWO Clark   Wed Oct 26 2005 04:44 AM
. * * Re: latest TWO typhoon_tip   Wed Oct 26 2005 03:40 PM
. * * Re: latest TWO Storm Hunter   Wed Oct 26 2005 04:10 PM
. * * Re: latest TWO Margie   Wed Oct 26 2005 05:35 PM
. * * Re: latest TWO typhoon_tip   Wed Oct 26 2005 04:37 PM
. * * Re: latest TWO JMII   Wed Oct 26 2005 05:34 PM
. * * Re: latest TWO wiley   Wed Oct 26 2005 04:52 PM
. * * Re: latest TWO Margie   Wed Oct 26 2005 01:23 PM
. * * Re: latest TWO Storm Hunter   Tue Oct 25 2005 08:41 PM
. * * Re: latest TWO Margie   Tue Oct 25 2005 08:58 PM
. * * Re: latest TWO typhoon_tip   Tue Oct 25 2005 07:05 PM
. * * Re: latest TWO harmlc.ath.cx   Tue Oct 25 2005 06:12 PM
. * * Re: latest TWO HanKFranK   Tue Oct 25 2005 06:24 PM
. * * Re: latest TWO Thunderbird12   Tue Oct 25 2005 07:06 PM
. * * Re: latest TWO Beaumont, TX   Tue Oct 25 2005 06:32 PM
. * * Re: latest TWO tpratch   Tue Oct 25 2005 05:30 PM
. * * Re: latest TWO typhoon_tip   Tue Oct 25 2005 06:35 PM
. * * Re: latest TWO Ed in Va   Tue Oct 25 2005 06:49 PM
. * * Re: latest TWO typhoon_tip   Tue Oct 25 2005 07:26 PM
. * * Re: latest TWO Katie   Tue Oct 25 2005 07:02 PM
. * * Re: latest TWO Ed in Va   Tue Oct 25 2005 07:05 PM
. * * Re: latest TWO Kimster   Tue Oct 25 2005 05:46 PM

Extra information
0 registered and 937 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  



Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating: *****
Thread views: 90409

Rate this thread

Jump to

Note: This is NOT an official page. It is run by weather hobbyists and should not be used as a replacement for official sources. 
CFHC's main servers are currently located at Hostdime.com in Orlando, FL.
Image Server Network thanks to Mike Potts and Amazon Web Services. If you have static file hosting space that allows dns aliasing contact us to help out! Some Maps Provided by:
Great thanks to all who donated and everyone who uses the site as well. Site designed for 800x600+ resolution
When in doubt, take the word of the National Hurricane Center